Almost from the second {that a} pro-Trump mob stormed into the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, conspiracy theories have ricocheted from the fringes of the web to the corridors of Congress. Republican officers and others on the correct have dismissed the assault because the work of mere vacationers, or sought to depict it as a false-flag operation by shadowy leftist teams — and even the federal authorities.
These baseless claims have seeped into dozens of legal instances stemming from the riot, and for greater than two years the federal government has needed to beat them again.
On Thursday, prosecutors might face their stiffest problem but on that entrance as Alan Hostetter, a former police chief turned yoga teacher from Southern California, goes on trial in Federal District Court in Washington. Few folks related to the Jan. 6 assault have embraced conspiracy theories in regards to the assault as absolutely as Mr. Hostetter, who’s planning to position them on the coronary heart of his protection.
Acting as his personal lawyer, Mr. Hostetter has stated that he intends to battle prices of conspiracy and obstruction based mostly on what he calls “three fundamental pillars”: that the 2020 election was stolen from President Donald J. Trump; that he and different rioters had no need to disrupt the challenges to the vote outcomes that had been happening contained in the Capitol on Jan. 6; and that, due to this fact, the assault on the constructing needed to have been staged by “federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies.”
To show all this, Mr. Hostetter had initially instructed the decide who will hear his trial that he wished to name as many as 30 witnesses as a part of his protection.
Among these on his listing had been former Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her daughter; Jacob Chansley, a fellow rioter higher generally known as the QAnon Shaman; a New York Times reporter who wrote an article about his spouse; and the final supervisor of the Kimpton George Hotel close to the Capitol, the place Mr. Hostetter stayed on Jan. 6 and which, as one in every of his motions stated, was in all probability the place that the “feds” used to surveil him.
While Mr. Hostetter ultimately backed away from his request, the trial is probably going to attract collectively most of the disparate strands of conspiracy theories which have stubbornly taken root on the correct within the two and a half years because the Capitol was attacked.
Prosecutors have warned for weeks that the continuing may devolve into chaos.
“The defendant’s goal with this trial — rather than a genuine engagement on the elements or the evidence — is to create a circuslike atmosphere and to promote his own brand,” they wrote final month to Royce C. Lamberth, the presiding decide.
The overwhelming majority of the greater than 60 Capitol riot instances which have gone to trial in Washington up to now have fallen into one in every of two buckets. They have both been temporary and simple assault or trespassing issues, or longer and weightier conspiracy instances involving advanced prices like sedition towards members of extremist teams such because the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers militia.
Every from time to time, the trials have veered from this regular course as defendants have taken the stand to supply uncommon — and customarily unsuccessful — arguments like blaming Mr. Trump for his or her resolution to storm the Capitol. But whereas a few of the trials have at instances been dramatic, most have been comparatively uneventful and largely trouble-free.
A frontrunner of a bunch referred to as the American Phoenix Project, which was based to battle the “fear-based tyranny” of coronavirus-related restrictions, Mr. Hostetter was accused of plotting with a number of members of the Three Percenter militia motion to storm the Capitol and cease the certification of Mr. Trump’s defeat.
Shortly after the election, prosecutors stated, Mr. Hostetter and one other chief of the American Phoenix Project, Russell Taylor, started to make use of the group “to advocate violence” towards people who “supported the 2020 election results.” At the top of November, for instance, Mr. Hostetter posted a video on the group’s YouTube channel accusing those that had not challenged the outcomes of committing treason.
“Some people at the highest level,” he stated, “need to be made an example of with an execution or three.”
Prosecutors say that Mr. Hostetter and Mr. Taylor communicated with their Three Percenter co-defendants principally by a bunch chat on Telegram referred to as “California Patriots-DC Brigade.” Mr. Taylor as soon as described the channel as being for “able bodied individuals that are going to DC on Jan. 6” and are “ready and willing to fight.”
Mr. Hostetter went to Washington on Jan. 3, 2021, prosecutors stated, checking right into a room on the Kimpton George. Three days later, carrying a hatchet in a backpack, he accompanied Mr. Taylor — who additionally had a hatchet in addition to a knife and a stun baton — right into a restricted space on the Capitol grounds.
In April, in a nod to the weird nature of Mr. Hostetter’s proposed protection, Judge Lamberth severed his case from the 4 co-defendants who stood accused of being Three Percenters and conspiring to disrupt the certification of the election on Jan. 6. By that point, Mr. Taylor had already pleaded responsible to conspiracy prices and underneath a take care of the federal government had agreed to function a witness and testify towards Mr. Hostetter at trial.
Prosecutors have stated that they intend to bolster their case with testimony from F.B.I. brokers who performed the investigation and cops who witnessed the violence on the Capitol. But this normal presentation might be upended if Mr. Hostetter tries to pursue the extra outrageous elements of his protection.
Last month, for example, throughout a routine pretrial listening to, he went on a tirade, accusing the federal government of getting prosecuted Stewart Rhodes, the chief of the Oath Keepers, on sedition prices so as to disguise the truth that Mr. Rhodes had been working with the authorities on Jan. 6.
Judge Lamberth lower him brief and dismissed his baseless claims.
“You don’t have any facts to support your allegations,” he stated.
Source: www.nytimes.com