Federal prosecutors pushed again on Monday in opposition to former President Donald J. Trump’s request to postpone his election interference trial in Washington till nicely into 2026, asserting that his important purpose for the delay — the quantity of proof his legal professionals should kind by way of — was vastly overstated.
Mr. Trump’s legal professionals, in a particularly aggressive transfer final week, requested Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, who’s overseeing the case, to place the trial off till a minimum of April 2026. That schedule would name for a jury to be seated almost a 12 months and a half after the 2024 election and nearly three years after the costs in opposition to Mr. Trump had been initially filed.
The legal professionals mentioned they wanted a lot time as a result of the quantity of discovery proof they anticipate to obtain from the federal government was monumental — as a lot as 8.5 terabytes of supplies, they instructed Judge Chutkan, totaling over 11.5 million pages.
As a part of their submitting to the decide, the legal professionals included a graph that purported to indicate how a stack of 11.5 million pages would end in a “tower of paper stretching nearly 5,000 feet into the sky.” That, the legal professionals identified, was “taller than the Washington Monument, stacked on top of itself eight times, with nearly a million pages to spare.”
Responding to those claims in courtroom papers on Monday, Molly Gaston, one of many prosecutors within the case, instructed Judge Chutkan that Mr. Trump’s characterization of the invention proof “overstates the amount of new and nonduplicative” materials his legal professionals will get and “exaggerates the challenge of reviewing it effectively.”
Ms. Gaston mentioned that Mr. Trump ought to already be conversant in a lot of the supplies, noting that about three million pages got here from unnamed “entities associated with” him. Hundreds of 1000’s of different pages, she added, have been publicly accessible for a while — amongst them, “the defendant’s tweets, Truth Social posts, campaign statements and court papers involving challenges to the 2020 election by the defendant or his allies.”
Ms. Gaston additionally mentioned that about a million pages of discovery got here from the House choose committee that investigated the assault on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. That trove of proof included tons of of transcripts of interviews or depositions, a majority of which, she asserted, “are already public in redacted form.”
Moreover, Ms. Gaston mentioned, the federal government turned over a big trove of supplies — together with greater than three million pages of paperwork from the Secret Service — that “should not require substantial time or attention from the defense team.”
All of the fabric, she added, was given to Mr. Trump’s legal professionals in a approach that the protection might evaluate shortly and simply “through targeted keyword searches and electronic sorting.”
Mr. Trump’s proposed trial date, Ms. Gaston wrote, “rests on the faulty assertion that it is necessary for a lawyer to conduct a page-by-page review of discovery for a defendant to receive a fair trial.”
“But the defendant can, should and apparently will adopt the benefits of electronic review to reduce the volume of material needed to be searched and manually reviewed,” she mentioned.
Mr. Trump has made no secret in non-public conversations along with his aides that he’s trying to win the following election as a strategy to attempt to resolve his array of authorized issues. To that finish, he has usually sought to decelerate prosecutors in all 4 of the legal circumstances he’s going through.
Indeed, if the previous president, and the present front-runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, can push his two federal trials — in Washington and Florida — till after the election and prevail, he might search to pardon himself after taking workplace or have his lawyer common dismiss the matter altogether.
Mr. Trump won’t be able to pardon himself if he’s in the end convicted in Manhattan, the place he faces state prices associated to hush cash funds to a porn star earlier than the 2016 election. That can be true in Fulton County, Ga., the place he stands accused with 18 co-defendants of tampering with the outcomes of the election in that state.
Prosecutors within the workplace of the Justice Department’s particular counsel, Jack Smith, filed their very own election interference case in opposition to Mr. Trump this month in Federal District Court in Washington. That indictment accused Mr. Trump and 6 unidentified co-conspirators of three overlapping plots to defraud the United States, to disrupt the ultimate certification of the election and to deprive individuals of their rights to have their votes counted.
Mr. Smith’s staff has requested Judge Chutkan to set their case for trial in January. If that schedule holds — which isn’t a certainty — the federal election interference case could be the primary to go earlier than a jury.
Judge Chutkan is anticipated to think about — and maybe problem a ruling — on the query of a trial date when the 2 sides meet for a listening to in her courtroom on Aug. 28.
The Manhattan case is ready to go to trial in late March whereas Mr. Trump’s different federal case — one wherein he stands accused of illegally retaining dozens of categorized paperwork after leaving workplace — is scheduled to go to trial in Fort Pierce, Fla., in May.
Last week, Fani T. Willis, the district lawyer of Fulton County, Ga., mentioned she hoped to take Mr. Trump to trial in her case as early as March 4.
Source: www.nytimes.com