The Federal Bureau of Investigation has revoked the safety clearances of three brokers who both took half within the riot on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, or later expressed views about it that positioned into query their “allegiance to the United States,” the bureau mentioned on Wednesday in a letter to congressional investigators.
The letter, written by a prime official on the F.B.I., got here in the future earlier than at the least two of the brokers — Marcus Allen and Stephen Friend — have been set to testify in entrance of a House Judiciary subcommittee investigating what Republicans contend is the “weaponization” of the federal authorities in opposition to conservatives.
For a number of months, Republican lawmakers have been courting F.B.I. brokers who they imagine help their contentions that the bureau and different federal companies have been turned in opposition to former President Donald J. Trump and his supporters each earlier than and after the Capitol assault.
Some of the brokers have come ahead as self-described whistle-blowers and brought steps like writing a letter to the leaders of the F.B.I. complaining about methods by which the bureau has discriminated in opposition to conservatives.
The brokers who had their safety clearances revoked — Mr. Allen, Mr. Friend and a 3rd man, Brett Gloss — have all been suspended by the F.B.I. because the bureau evaluations their instances, based on congressional investigators.
Lawyers for Mr. Allen and Mr. Friend didn’t reply to messages looking for remark. A lawyer for Mr. Gloss couldn’t instantly be reached.
Mr. Gloss’s top-secret clearance was revoked two weeks in the past after bureau investigators decided that whereas shifting with the pro-Trump mob on Jan. 6, he entered a restricted space of the Capitol grounds — a violation of federal legislation.
While he has not been charged with any crimes, Mr. Gloss was discovered by the F.B.I. to have supplied “false and/or misleading information” about what he noticed on Jan. 6 and about whether or not he was in a restricted space that day, based on the letter, which was despatched to Representative Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the weaponization subcommittee, by Christopher Dunham, the F.B.I.’s appearing assistant director.
Mr. Gloss denied witnessing violence or being within the restricted space on the Capitol, however these statements have been inconsistent with images he took on Jan. 6 in addition to with publicly accessible movies, the letter mentioned. Mr. Gloss additionally did not report his presence close to the Capitol, the letter added, even after being warned by one in every of his supervisors to take action.
“Mr. Gloss’s refusal to provide full, frank and truthful answers to lawful questions of security officials in connection with a personnel security or trustworthiness determination should result in an adverse clearance action,” the letter mentioned.
A spokesman for Mr. Jordan, Russell Dye, characterised the F.B.I.’s motion as “a desperate attempt to salvage their reputation” that was coming “before brave whistle-blowers testify about the agency’s politicized behavior and retaliation against anyone who dares speak out.”
Mr. Allen’s top-secret safety clearance was revoked after the bureau discovered that he had “expressed sympathy for persons or organizations that advocate, threaten or use force or violence,” the letter mentioned. F.B.I. investigators decided that Mr. Allen had despatched an e-mail from his bureau account to a number of colleagues months after the Capitol assault, urging them to “exercise extreme caution and discretion in pursuit of any investigative inquiries or leads pertaining to the events of” Jan. 6, the letter mentioned.
Mr. Allen additionally despatched an e-mail linking to a web site stating that “federal law enforcement had some degree of infiltration among the crowds gathered at the Capitol,” main Mr. Allen to remark that this supposed reality raised “serious concerns” in regards to the U.S. authorities’s participation within the riot.
F.B.I. investigators additionally discovered that Mr. Allen, who filed a lawsuit in opposition to Mr. Wray final yr contesting the preliminary suspension of his clearance, failed to offer related info to fellow brokers investigating the riot about individuals who allegedly took half within the assault, the letter mentioned.
The letter famous that when one other agent requested Mr. Allen to conduct open supply analysis a couple of Jan. 6 suspect, he reported again that he had discovered no info that the individual had engaged in any prison exercise or had any “nexus to terrorism.”
Based on Mr. Allen’s stories, the letter mentioned, the opposite agent closed the case, nevertheless it was later reopened after a unique F.B.I. worker found publicly accessible info displaying that the goal of the inquiry had assaulted cops on the Capitol.
Mr. Friend, whose safety clearance was revoked on Tuesday, had refused final summer season to participate in a SWAT arrest of a Jan. 6 suspect who was dealing with misdemeanor prices. Mr. Friend had taken the place that the raid represented an extreme use of drive.
“I have an oath to uphold the Constitution,” Mr. Friend, a 12-year veteran of the bureau, instructed his supervisors when he declined to affix the operation on Aug. 24 in Jacksonville, Fla. “I have a moral objection and want to be considered a conscientious objector.”
According to Justice Department information, there was just one Jan. 6-related arrest within the Jacksonville space on Aug. 24: that of Tyler Bensch, who was accused of being a member of a right-wing militia group linked to the Three Percenter motion.
What Mr. Friend omitted from his account was that whereas Mr. Bensch was charged with solely misdemeanors, paperwork in his case say that on Jan. 6, he posted a video of himself exterior the Capitol sporting physique armor and a fuel masks and carrying an AR-15-style rifle. The paperwork additionally say that witnesses later instructed the F.B.I. that that they had seen images of Mr. Bensch carrying an analogous rifle at different instances.
According to the letter, Mr. Friend “espoused an alternative narrative about the events at the U.S. Capitol” throughout his communications along with his supervisors about refusing to take part within the arrest of Mr. Bensch.
The letter additionally famous that in September 2022, Mr. Friend downloaded paperwork from F.B.I. pc methods to “an unauthorized removable flash drive.” The letter didn’t specify what types of paperwork Mr. Friend had taken with him.
Source: www.nytimes.com