Federal prosecutors unsealed expenses on Friday towards a veteran police officer in Washington, accusing him of obstructing justice by leaking regulation enforcement info to Enrique Tarrio, the previous chief of the Proud Boys.
Prosecutors say that the officer, Shane Lamond, 47, advised Mr. Tarrio that he wouldn’t face hate crime expenses after a gaggle of Proud Boys underneath his command burned a Black Lives Matter banner at a historic Black church in Washington after a pro-Trump rally within the metropolis in December 2020. The episode happened weeks earlier than the far-right group performed a central position within the Capitol assault on Jan. 6, 2021.
Mr. Lamond, who labored as an intelligence knowledgeable for the Metropolitan Police Department, was suspended from his job as an investigation into his ties to Mr. Tarrio moved ahead. He additionally gave Mr. Tarrio advance discover that he could be arrested in reference to the banner-burning episode in early January 2021 as he returned to Washington for the occasions of Jan. 6.
Mark E. Schamel, a lawyer for Mr. Lamond, declined to touch upon the costs.
Prosecutors started analyzing Mr. Lamond and Mr. Tarrio’s relationship after the Capitol assault, when a gaggle of about 200 Proud Boys helped lead a pro-Trump mob in breaching barricades and finally disrupting the congressional certification of the 2020 election outcomes.
Mr. Tarrio and three of his lieutenants had been convicted this month of seditious conspiracy in reference to the assault.
According to an indictment filed towards Mr. Lamond in Federal District Court in Washington, Mr. Tarrio supplied him details about the Proud Boys’ plans to descend on Washington on Jan. 6. In a textual content to Mr. Lamond on Dec. 19, 2020 — the identical day President Donald J. Trump posted a tweet summoning his followers to the town for what he known as a “wild” protest — Mr. Tarrio stated that the Proud Boys’ participation within the Jan. 6 occasion could be “extremely small” and that members of the group wouldn’t be sporting their conventional black-and-yellow uniforms.
The two males had been in touch since July 2019 and corresponded often after the 2020 election, with Mr. Tarrio typically offering discover about plans to convey his group to rallies in help of Mr. Trump. Mr. Lamond “regularly provided sensitive law enforcement information” in return, the indictment stated, together with steerage about their actions and people of anti-Trump protesters in Washington.
The exchanges, typically by means of encrypted messaging, counsel the extent to which Mr. Tarrio and different Proud Boys leaders cultivated relationships with members of regulation enforcement, particularly in cities the place they had been planning rallies.
Even after Jan. 6, Mr. Tarrio and Mr. Lamond continued to speak in regards to the authorized fallout from the riot, exchanging reactions to the violence and buying and selling details about the bigger investigation. Texts included within the indictment present that Mr. Tarrio, who had additionally handed alongside info to the F.B.I. and Florida cops previously, appeared to have stored a equally shut and cooperative relationship with Mr. Lamond.
“I think I could have stopped this whole thing,” Mr. Tarrio texted on Jan. 7, earlier than providing to assist the police arrest somebody in reference to the riot.
“Let me know if she’s on your list,” Mr. Tarrio wrote. “I’ll have her turn herself in.”
“Looks like the feds are locking people up for rioting at the Capitol,” Mr. Lamond texted again on Jan. 8. “I hope none of your guys were among them.”
In addition to obstructing the investigation into Mr. Tarrio, Mr. Lamond had intentionally misrepresented the conversations to investigators, prosecutors stated. Mr. Lamond described the exchanges as “one-sided” and as routine intelligence-gathering when he had typically reached out to Mr. Tarrio with privileged particulars about Metropolitan Police Department actions.
Lawyers for Mr. Tarrio sought to name Mr. Lamond a protection witness on the sedition trial, however Mr. Schamel advised them that if Mr. Lamond had been known as to testify, he would invoke his Fifth Amendment proper towards self-incrimination. Mr. Tarrio’s authorized staff then tried to have Judge Timothy J. Kelly confer immunity on Mr. Lamond and compel him to take stand, however the choose refused to take action.
Unable to acquire Mr. Lamond’s dwell testimony, Mr. Tarrio’s attorneys selected to introduce a number of of the textual content messages the 2 males exchanged in an effort to indicate that they had been in shut contact with one another within the run-up not solely to Jan. 6 but in addition to different pro-Trump occasions in Washington that preceded it.
The attorneys had been hoping to steer the jury that Mr. Tarrio couldn’t have been planning a seditious plot towards the federal government whereas actively preserving a veteran police officer within the loop in regards to the Proud Boys’ actions.
“I am shocked and disgusted to see that the government used certain information in the indictment against Lt. Shane Lamond that was not allowed to be introduced in our trial,” stated Nayib Hassan, a lawyer for Mr. Tarrio.
Source: www.nytimes.com