It has been an intense couple of weeks right here at Interpreter HQ. “India’s Daughters,” the particular e-newsletter collection that I created with my colleagues Emily Schmall and Shalini Venugopal Bhagat, premiered final week. There might be a brand new chapter on Friday, and you may meet up with the primary installment right here for those who missed it.
I’ve additionally been reporting on violations of worldwide legislation in Israel and Gaza for the final two weeks, work that has constructed on the extraordinary efforts of my colleagues who’re reporting from the area, typically at nice private peril. But though I’m removed from the preventing, enthusiastic about warfare crimes and atrocities every single day has taken its toll — and created a stark divide in my studying and watching habits.
On one aspect of that divide are the various treaties and authorized sources I’ve been consulting, filling my browser’s tabs with numerous Geneva Conventions, skilled commentaries, worldwide legal legal guidelines and navy manuals on the legal guidelines of warfare, in addition to experiences from The Times and different sources on what’s truly taking place to civilians on the bottom.
The different, totally completely different class is made up of the issues I’ve been studying and watching to attempt to calm down after lengthy days at work — all of that are about as removed from violence and warfare as something could possibly be.
Longtime readers will in all probability guess that “Pride and Prejudice,” by Jane Austen, is on the prime of my decompress-and-disconnect checklist. As I’ve talked about earlier than, that’s all the time the primary e book that I choose up after I can’t sleep or in any other case must calm my frenzied mind. But these days I’ve been pairing it with “The Scandalous Confessions of Lydia Bennet, Witch,” by Melinda Taub, another retelling of the story with a few large twists. Full disclosure: The writer is my sister, so I gained’t supply my very own evaluation right here. Instead, here’s what Amal El-Mohtar needed to say about it in The Times:
“It’s simply wonderful, a laugh-and-cry book. Taub’s close reading of and research into Austen’s work is remarkable; she threads a careful needle between invention and retelling, contemporary legibility and historical homage. The result is a terrifically well-balanced novel blending romance, fantasy and mystery: The story shifts its weight and colors depending on whom you think Lydia’s addressing with her narrative at any given moment.”
I additionally discover sports activities narratives soothing. “Beckham,” Netflix’s rose-tinted documentary about David Beckham, is structured round a collection of pivotal soccer matches in his profession, which turned out to be best for me: The video games generate sufficient suspense for the episodes to carry my consideration — Will he rating? Who will win?— however, as a result of they largely occurred a decade or two in the past, no precise stress in regards to the outcomes.
The sports activities angle in all probability additionally explains why I all the time discover “Wimbledon,” a 2004 film starring Kirsten Dunst and Paul Bettany, so enjoyable. Although it’s nominally a romantic comedy, the motion is, as in “Beckham,” constructed round a collection of tennis matches, with barely a gesture towards in any other case preserving the principle characters aside. As somebody who isn’t a very fervent fan of even actual tennis matches, I discover fictional ones pleasantly untaxing.
On days after I need to unwind however don’t really feel like I may deal with even a Nora Ephron quantity of emotion, “Wimbledon” it’s.
Reader responses: Books that you simply suggest
Margot Miller, a reader in Easton, Md., recommends “The Most Secret Memory of Men” by Mohamed Mbougar Sarr:
One of the most effective books I’ve ever learn, and I maintain a Ph.D. in French literature. Exquisitely written.
What are you studying?
Thank you to everybody who wrote in to inform me about what you’re studying. Please hold the submissions coming!
I need to hear about issues you’ve got learn (or watched or listened to) that you simply suggest to the Interpreter group.
If you’d prefer to take part, you may fill out this type. I could publish your response in a future e-newsletter.
Source: www.nytimes.com