Singapore on Wednesday executed a person convicted of conspiring to visitors about two kilos of hashish, a punishment that human rights teams known as grossly extreme with different nations all over the world stress-free their stances on marijuana.
The man, Tangaraju Suppiah, a 46-year-old Singaporean, was sentenced in 2018 for coordinating with two different males to import the hashish in 2013. Although he by no means got here into contact with the drug, he was sentenced to dying by hanging after a choose dominated that he was linked to the opposite males by way of two telephone numbers belonging to him.
Singapore’s narcotics legal guidelines are a number of the harshest on this planet and mandate the dying penalty for some drug trafficking offenses. Last 12 months, the nation executed 11 individuals, all for nonviolent drug offenses.
Singapore has continued to make use of executions for drug-related crimes though its neighbor and rival, Malaysia, just lately ended its necessary dying penalty for critical crimes, together with drug offenses.
Phil Robertson, the deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch, mentioned in an announcement that the sentence was “outrageous and unacceptable” and “raises serious concerns that Singapore is launching a renewed spree to empty its death row in a misguided deterrence effort that actually reveals more about Singapore’s barbarity than anything else.”
Kirsten Han, a dying penalty opponent, mentioned that Mr. Tangaraju’s execution confirmed that Singapore had prioritized “looking tough on crime” over enacting more practical insurance policies to cut back hurt from medicine.
Activists mentioned the proof in opposition to Mr. Tangaraju — the numbers on the telephones of the opposite two males — was largely circumstantial. Human rights organizations additionally raised issues that Mr. Tangaraju didn’t have entry to a lawyer when he was first questioned by the authorities — Singaporean regulation doesn’t assure any such proper — and was denied entry to a Tamil interpreter when the police took his assertion.
Before the execution, the United Nations’ high human rights official known as for the authorities to “urgently reconsider” the sentence.
“We have concerns around due process and respect for fair trial guarantees,” Ravina Shamdasani, a spokeswoman for the U.N. excessive commissioner for human rights, mentioned in an announcement.
The Singaporean authorities dismissed these issues, saying that Mr. Tangaraju had been afforded due course of. In an announcement issued earlier than his execution, the nation’s Central Narcotics Bureau mentioned that he “had access to legal counsel throughout the process.” It additionally mentioned {that a} choose had discovered his declare of being denied an interpreter to be “disingenuous,” as a result of he had not requested for an interpreter when giving subsequent statements to the authorities.
“Capital punishment is part of Singapore’s comprehensive harm prevention strategy, which targets both drug demand and supply,” the assertion mentioned.
The different two males linked to the case each gave proof in opposition to Mr. Tangaraju at his trial. One of them, who was arrested with the hashish in query, pleaded responsible to trafficking 499.9 grams of the drug — slightly below the five hundred grams, or 1.1 kilos, that may draw the dying penalty — and was sentenced to 23 years in jail and 15 strokes of the cane. The different acquired a discharge not amounting to acquittal.
Mr. Tangaraju’s household campaigned for clemency till his execution, issuing video appeals and writing letters to Singapore’s president, Halimah Yacob. On Tuesday, a Singaporean courtroom rejected a last-minute attraction from the household.
“His family said they weren’t going to give up on him until the very last moment,” mentioned Ms. Han, the anti-death-penalty activist, who spoke to Mr. Tangaraju’s household after the execution. “It was important to them that they kept trying to fight for him.”
Source: www.nytimes.com