WARNING: Graphic content material
An emotional Jarryd Hayne walked exterior the courthouse – hand-in-hand together with his spouse Amellia – after being discovered responsible of two counts of sexual assault.
He struggled to talk to the awaiting media scrum for a number of seconds as tears welled in his eyes, earlier than saying that he instructed the reality.
“I did not cover up evidence, I did not lie,” he stated
Asked if he would enchantment the choice, he stated “yes”.
A jury has discovered ex-NRL star Jarryd Hayne responsible of sexually assaulting a lady four-and-a-half years in the past.
The 35-year-old had pleaded not responsible to 2 counts of sexual activity with out consent regarding the 2018 NRL Grand Final evening.
After eight days of deliberating, the jury was requested to present their verdict on every rely, to which one juror learn out: “guilty”.
As the decision was learn out, Hayne’s spouse Amellia put her head in her fingers and cried, whereas different supporters additionally turned emotional.
Once the jury was discharged, Hayne stood up and walked over to his spouse and mom to embrace them.
Jury’s query earlier than verdict
Earlier, the jury requested the decide a query after greater than every week of impasse deliberations.
On Tuesday afternoon, the NSW District Court heard they despatched a be aware to Judge Graham Turnbull SC which learn: “Dear Your Honour, we’ve taken another vote, and while we have made progress, we are not at a unanimous decision. We would like to clarify if ignorance of the law is a sufficient defence.”
The 35-year-old former NRL star has pleaded not responsible to 2 counts of sexual activity with out consent regarding an alleged incident on the evening of the 2018 NRL Grand Final.
In response to the jury’s be aware, Judge Turnbull instructed them that the “short answer is no”, however that the details of this case present there is a bit more nuance to that.
“In this case, you must remember the burden of proof is on the Crown and the accused does not have to prove anything,” Judge Turnbull stated.
“Neither the accused nor the complainant misunderstood that it was anything but illegal to force yourself on a woman without her consent, whether it be digitally or orally.
“It’s no part of the accused’s evidence that he did not know that it was illegal to have digital or oral intercourse with someone without consent. He has given an explanation and I remind you that if you accept that explanation as true or possibly true, that constitutes reasonable doubt and he’s entitled to be acquitted.”
Judge Turnbull instructed them they must be glad past cheap doubt.
He reminded them it was the Crown’s case there was “never any consent to any sexual activity,” and that was conveyed by phrases and conduct explicitly to Hayne.
Judge’s message to jury
Earlier on Tuesday, Judge Turnbull instructed the jury to focus solely on what was stated inside “these four walls” and requested them to speak any points.
Turnbull’s prolonged message got here a day after he made a “Black Direction” asking them to rethink the votes of some jurors.
That path was made in response to their be aware saying they’d been unable to achieve a choice regardless of prolonged dialogue.
He requested them to persevere and to be assured that they may let the courtroom know in the event that they have been “having trouble being unanimous”.
He instructed the jury they’d been diligent for some days and he didn’t wish to encourage them to take any explicit course, however reminded them they may ask for steering if wanted.
Judge Turnbull additionally gave a path about avoiding stereotypes, on the request of defence barrister Margaret Cunneen SC.
“You must only have regard to the evidence in the trial — I’ve said that many times — nothing beyond these four walls,” he stated.
“You must be true to your oaths and affirmations… Being satisfied beyond reasonable doubt does not mean it is more likely than not. It is not enough to be satisfied on the balance of probabilities — what is what is required is proof beyond reasonable doubt.”
The jury heard that if there is a matter, they need to talk that with the courtroom. But they have been instructed that message shouldn’t be seen as placing any stress on them.
“You are the only ones to have heard and seen all the evidence and therefore it’s what you make of the evidence which is the touch stone,” Judge Turnbull stated.
“The verdict is guilty or not guilty, not guilty or innocent.”
The jury of six males and 6 ladies retired to deliberate about 3:30pm on Monday, March 27.
Night in query
During the 11-day trial, Crown prosecutor John Sfinas argued {that a} girl was sexually assaulted after Hayne stopped by her home on the outskirts of Newcastle on September 30, on his approach again to Sydney from a boozy buck’s weekend.
The courtroom heard the lady determined she didn’t wish to have intercourse with Hayne after she realised a taxi was ready exterior.
But Hayne instructed the courtroom the digitally penetrative and oral acts have been consensual, he was “shocked” when he realised he was lined within the girl’s blood and stated he unintentionally clipped her together with his finger.
The trial heard the pair had chatted on social media for 2 weeks main as much as September 30 however had not met in individual.
It heard Hayne had invited the lady to satisfy him out the evening earlier than whereas he was at a celebration through the bucks’ weekend, however she declined. She as a substitute invited him for espresso or breakfast the following morning.
The courtroom heard when Hayne arrived on the girl’s home shortly after 9pm the following evening, her mom had answered the door.
According to Hayne’s proof, the mom directed him to the bed room, the place he felt awkward as the lady was shy, regardless of having despatched sexual and suggestive texts.
He stated he tried to interrupt the ice by placing just a few of his “go-to” songs on YouTube, together with Ed Sheeran’s cowl of Oasis’ track ‘Wonderwall’.
The courtroom was instructed that a short while later, the entrance door was knocked on by the taxi driver. Hayne had instructed her he was solely going to the home to choose up a bag.
Hayne instructed the courtroom he then went out to observe among the NRL Grand Final with the lady’s mom earlier than coming again into the bed room, when the Crown argued the alleged assault — which Hayne strenuously denies — occurred.
Throughout the trial, Judge Turnbull urged the jury to keep away from stereotypes and preconceived concepts when making their determination.
Judge Graham Turnbull gave a prolonged message to the jury on Tuesday morning, the day after he made a “Black Direction” asking them to rethink the votes of some jurors.
That path was made in response to their be aware saying they’d been unable to achieve a choice regardless of prolonged dialogue.
The 35-year-old former-NRL star has pleaded not responsible to 2 counts of sexual activity with out consent regarding an alleged incident on the evening of the 2018 NRL Grand Final.
During the 11-day NSW District Court trial, Crown prosecutor John Sfinas argued {that a} girl was sexually assaulted after Hayne stopped by her home on the outskirts of Newcastle on September 30, on his approach again to Sydney from a boozy buck’s weekend.
The courtroom heard the lady determined she didn’t wish to have intercourse with Hayne after she realised a taxi was ready exterior.
But Hayne instructed the courtroom the penetrative and oral acts have been consensual, he was “shocked” when he realised he was lined within the girl’s blood and stated he unintentionally clipped her together with his finger.
The jury of six males and 6 ladies retired to deliberate about 3:30pm on Monday, March 27.
They deliberated till Friday and returned on Monday, after they gave a be aware to Judge Graham Turnbull saying that they have been unable to achieve a choice and sought steering on proceed.
In response, Judge Turnbull gave the “Black Direction,” saying expertise has proven a jury can typically decide after having extra time.
But having not obtained an additional be aware from the jury by Tuesday morning, Judge Turnbull referred to as the jury again into the courtroom.
He emphasised what he stated yesterday about persevering and requested them to be assured that they may let the courtroom know in the event that they have been “having trouble being unanimous”.
He instructed the jury they’d been diligent for some days and he didn’t wish to encourage them to take any explicit course, however reminded them they may ask for steering if wanted.
Judge Turnbull additionally gave a path about keep away from making stereotypes, on the request of defence barrister Margaret Cunneen SC.
“You must only have regard to the evidence in the trial — I’ve said that many times — nothing beyond these fall walls,” he stated.
“You must be true to your oaths and affirmations… Being satisfied beyond reasonable doubt does not mean it is more likely than not. It is not enough to be satisfied on the balance of probabilities — what is what is required is proof beyond reasonable doubt.”
The jury heard that if there is a matter, they need to talk that with the courtroom. But they have been instructed that message shouldn’t be seen as placing any stress on them.
“You are the only ones to have heard and seen all the evidence and therefore it’s what you make of the evidence which is the touch stone,” Judge Turnbull stated.
“The verdict is guilty or not guilty, not guilty or innocent.”
Night in query
The trial heard the pair had chatted on social media for 2 weeks main as much as September 30 however had not met in individual.
It heard Hayne had invited the lady to satisfy him out the evening earlier than whereas he was at a celebration through the bucks’ weekend, however she declined. She as a substitute invited him for espresso or breakfast the following morning.
The courtroom heard when Hayne arrived on the girl’s home shortly after 9pm the following evening, her mom had answered the door.
According to Hayne’s proof, the mom directed him to the bed room, the place he felt awkward as the lady was shy, regardless of having despatched sexual and suggestive texts.
He stated he tried to interrupt the ice by placing just a few of his “go-to” songs on YouTube, together with Ed Sheeran’s cowl of Oasis’ track ‘Wonderwall’.
The courtroom was instructed that a short while later, the entrance door was knocked on by the taxi driver. Hayne had instructed her he was solely going to the home to choose up a bag.
Hayne instructed the courtroom he then went out to observe among the NRL Grand Final with the lady’s mom earlier than coming again into the bed room, when the Crown argued the alleged assault — which Hayne strenuously denies — occurred.
Throughout the trial, Judge Turnbull urged the jury to keep away from stereotypes and preconceived concepts when making their determination.
Source: www.foxsports.com.au