Jarryd Hayne has been taken into jail after having his bail revoked as he waits to study his jail time period after being convicted of sexually assaulting a lady.
Hayne might be sentenced to a jail time period when he faces sentencing proceedings on May 8 after he was discovered responsible of sexually assaulting a lady in 2018.
Hayne was earlier this month convicted by a jury of a sexually assaulting a lady at her Newcastle house on NRL grand remaining evening on September 2018.
The 35-year-old final week walked out of Sydney’s Downing Centre District Court on conditional bail earlier than he faces sentencing proceedings in lower than 4 weeks.
However, the Director of Public Prosecutions made a Supreme Court detention software to instantly place him behind bars.
Hayne and his attorneys arrived on the Supreme Court on Friday morning to combat the applying earlier than Justice Richard Button.
Justice Richard Button agreed to the Crown prosecution’s detention software and ordered that Hayne be taken into custody instantly.
Hayne was impassive all through the 2 hour and 45-minute listening to however he grew to become emotional as he embraced his spouse Amellia Bonnici.
The pair hugged for a number of minutes earlier than he was handcuffed.
Ms Bonnici sobbed as he was taken from the court docket.
“You’re innocent,” one feminine supporter yelled.
“Stay strong big fella,” one other male supporter mentioned.
Under NSW legislation, an individual who’s discovered responsible of an offence and might be sentenced to a full time jail time period have to be refused bail until they will set up particular or distinctive circumstances.
The first software to detain Hayne was made within the District Court and efficiently opposed by his barrister Margaret Cunneen SC, who instructed the court docket the previous Parramatta fullback was “too high-profile” to be despatched to jail within the midst of main media protection.
Judge Turnbull allowed Hayne to stay on bail to assist his household get sorted earlier than sentence proceedings on May 8.
In the Supreme Court on Friday, Ms Cunneen argued that Hayne ought to stay on bail due to a mix of things together with that he confronted “oppressive” situations in protecting custody if he had been taken to jail instantly.
“It’s 25 days in isolation when it’s not required, it’s not called for,” she mentioned.
She additionally argued media reporting had been disproportionate and that he and his spouse had been subjected to “toxic” abuse on social media.
She described the “vitriol” in opposition to her shopper as being “absolutely extraordinary”.
“There is something about this case that .. has incited the most toxic responses on social media that are out of proportion to the circumstances of this case.”
She argued that it was an “exceptional case” and that the granting of bail for a “very short time” was justified.
Hayne will face sentence proceedings in lower than 4 weeks the place is predicted to be taken into custody.
“It is accepted… we all agree that it is inevitable that Mr Hayne will go into custody,” Justice Button requested
“Yes your honour,” Ms Cunneen replied.
Hayne has twice been discovered responsible by a jury.
Following his first responsible verdict, he spent 9 months in jail earlier than he final 12 months had his earlier conviction quashed on attraction.
He is as soon as once more anticipated to attraction his newest conviction within the Court of Appeal and continues to take care of his innocence.
And Ms Cunneen argued that Hayne had been on bail for four-and-a-half years with out incident throughout three trials and an attraction.
She additional submitted that he didn’t characterize a hazard to the neighborhood.
However, Crown prosecutor Brett Hatfield argued it didn’t quantity to distinctive or particular circumstances which justified him remaining on bail.
Mr Hatfield argued many prisoners might be managed in protecting custody.
More to return.
Source: www.foxsports.com.au