“The worst thing is it seems that teams are using it as a deliberate planned way to get a wicket,” Waugh mentioned whereas commenting on a video on Twitter of Pakistan pacer Zaib-un-Nisa working out a Rwanda batter through the ongoing U-19 Women’s T20 World Cup.
@piersmorgan The worst factor is plainly groups are utilizing it as a deliberate deliberate strategy to get a wicket.????
— Mark Waugh (@juniorwaugh349) 1673843210000
To which Prasad replied “Yes right , Bowlers planning to get a player out by legal means is the worst thing. Batsman wanting to take unfair advantage by not staying back in the crease is the best thing.”
Yes proper , Bowlers planning to get a participant out by authorized means is the worst factorBatsman eager to take unfair a… https://t.co/5SWSjWw00J
— Venkatesh Prasad (@venkateshprasad) 1673855338000
Run-outs when the batter tries to go previous the crease earlier than the bowler releases the ball are referred to as ‘Mankading’, paying homage to the primary such dismissal crafted by Vinoo Mankad when he ran out Bill Brown on the non-striker’s finish on this style twice within the 1947-48 Test sequence towards Australia.
Once thought of unfair play, though authorized, within the gentleman’s recreation, such run outs on the bowler’s finish are not thought of ‘unfair play’ since October final 12 months after the ICC amended its rule guide.
However, the controversy continues if such dismissals are towards the ‘spirit of recreation’.
Last week, India skipper Rohit Sharma had withdrawn an enchantment for run out on the non-striker’s finish by Mohammed Shami after Sri Lanka captain Dasun Shanaka left the crease and the Indian pacer took the bails off.
(With inputs from PTI)