The environmental motion’s stance on nuclear energy is “wrong” and derailed the sector’s improvement, in line with the filmmaker Oliver Stone.
During an interview with CNBC’s Tania Bryer on the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Stone — who’s made a brand new documentary referred to as “Nuclear Now” — was requested the place his ardour to sort out the local weather disaster got here from.
“Passion comes from the fact that … it’s my children, hopefully grandchildren soon,” replied Stone, who was talking to CNBC on Tuesday afternoon.
“But what are they going to do? It’s going to be a miserable existence if we have worse and worse hurricanes, fires, droughts. It’s frightening.”
“We had the solution [nuclear power] … and the environmental movement, to be honest, just derailed it. I think the environmental movement did a lot of good, a lot of good … [I’m] not knocking it, but in this one major matter, it was wrong. It was wrong.”
“And what they did was so destructive, because by now we would have 10,000 nuclear reactors built around the world and we would have set an example like France set for us, but no one … followed France, or Sweden for that matter.”
France has been a significant participant in nuclear energy for many years, whereas nuclear energy accounts for roughly 30% of Sweden’s energy provide, in line with the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.
Stone’s documentary relies on “A Bright Future,” a guide by Joshua S. Goldstein and Staffan A. Qvist.
The Academy Award winner, who has made statements deemed by many to be extraordinarily controversial, is finest recognized for movies akin to “Platoon”, “Born on the Fourth of July” and “Wall Street.”
His movie on nuclear provides to the continuing debate and dialogue about nuclear energy and its function within the years forward.
The International Energy Agency states that “nuclear power has historically been one of the largest contributors of carbon-free electricity globally.”
It provides that “while it faces significant challenges in some countries, it has significant potential to contribute to power sector decarbonisation.”
Elsewhere, environmental organizations akin to Greenpeace are essential. “Nuclear power is touted as a solution to our energy problems, but in reality it’s complex and hugely expensive to build,” its web site states.
“It also creates huge amounts of hazardous waste,” Greenpeace says. “Renewable energy is cheaper and can be installed quickly. Together with battery storage, it can generate the power we need and slash our emissions.”