The feedback from The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) to the European Commission which is now wanting into the problem underscores the high-stakes battle between Big Tech and Europe’s main telecoms operators.
“There is no evidence of a competition problem or a market failure to the detriment of end-users regarding IP-interconnection,” the group stated.
Echoing Big Tech’s arguments, BEREC stated it has its doubts a few obligatory community price levied on the businesses.
“It is questionable that mandatory payments from CAPs (content and application providers) to ISPs (internet service providers) would lead to member states meeting the connectivity targets,” BEREC stated.
“On the contrary, it is rather likely that ISPs in already well supplied areas would benefit the most.”
Discover the tales of your curiosity
It stated a compulsory price could drawback smaller telecoms operators with much less economies of scale and bargaining energy, whereas different telecoms corporations with their very own streaming or cloud providers could discriminate and unfairly promote these providers. Such a price can also result in worth hikes for shoppers, disincentivise Big Tech from investments and breach EU internet neutrality guidelines, BEREC stated.
Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telefonica and Telecom Italia have been lobbying for Big Tech to shoulder among the community prices.
Alphabet Inc’s Google, Apple Inc, Meta Platforms Inc, Netflix Inc, Amazon.com Inc and Microsoft Corp, which telcos say account for greater than half of knowledge web site visitors, have rejected the proposal.
Source: economictimes.indiatimes.com