When Prince Harry and his spouse, Meghan, decamped Britain for the United States in 2020, he portrayed it as an act of survival towards a relentlessly intrusive British press. On Tuesday, after a chaotic encounter with photographers in New York City, Harry discovered the media glare might be simply as intense in his adopted house.
With particulars persevering with to filter out about what precisely occurred to Harry, Meghan and her mom, Doria Ragland, as photographers pursued them in Midtown Manhattan, the episode underscored a fundamental paradox within the lives of this superstar couple: they plead for privateness, but additionally search publicity, with a Netflix documentary, a tell-all memoir by Harry and public appearances that can inevitably draw cameras.
The frenzy in New York is a reminder of the grievances that Harry has held for many years towards the British press, which stays the first marketplace for paparazzi photographs of him and Meghan. In 1997, his mom, Princess Diana, died in a automotive crash in Paris whereas fleeing photographers; Harry has blamed them for her loss of life and expressed fears that historical past might repeat itself along with his spouse and household.
But the episode additionally illustrates a dilemma for Harry: Even the involvement of the New York Police Department didn’t spare his household being swarmed by paparazzi, who pursued them even after they took refuge in a police station.
The position of the police in Tuesday’s incident is drawing consideration in London as a result of Harry has filed a authorized problem towards Britain’s Home Office, after it rejected his request for the Metropolitan Police to offer safety to him and his household once they go to Britain.
“The example of what happened in New York suggests that the kind of police protection Harry wants in London is not going to be enough to protect him or his family,” mentioned Ed Owens, a historian who has studied relations between the monarchy and the media. “He’s not engaging with this reality.”
In California, the place they now stay, Harry and Meghan make use of non-public safety guards who’re licensed to hold weapons. But they aren’t allowed to journey with armed guards in Britain, which is one motive Harry has requested for police safety, and has provided to pay for it himself. Lawyers for the Home Office argued in court docket that law enforcement officials shouldn’t be employed out to paying prospects.
Harry has described the lack of his safety element as one of the vital worrisome penalties of his bitter cut up from his household and his withdrawal from royal duties. In his memoir, “Spare,” he wrote that from childhood, he had by no means traveled with out three armed bodyguards. During negotiations with palace officers over his new standing, Harry mentioned, he begged for the bodyguards to be left in place, even when he misplaced all the opposite royal perks.
“I offered to defray the cost of security out of my own pocket,” he wrote. “I wasn’t sure how I’d do that, but I’d find a way.”
The burden of paying for round the clock safety, say individuals who know the couple, is likely one of the causes Harry and Meghan have struck profitable publishing and programming offers with Netflix and Penguin Random House.
In a press release on Wednesday, the couple’s spokeswoman prompt that the risk posed by the photographers was as a lot to pedestrians, different motorists, and law enforcement officials as to the couple or Ms. Ragland. It described “a near catastrophic car chase at the hands of a ring of highly aggressive paparazzi.”
That is extra dramatic than the account given by the New York police in addition to the taxi driver who picked up the couple and Ms. Ragland.
The driver, Sukhcharn Singh, mentioned he wouldn’t characterize it as a chase and added that he was not afraid, although his passengers clearly have been. A police spokesman acknowledged that the photographers posed a problem, however mentioned the three arrived at their vacation spot on the Upper East Side with out “reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests.”
The New York Police Department declined to touch upon safety deployment for high-profile guests to the town. But an official with data of the method mentioned the police do their very own impartial analysis and evaluation of such visits, earlier than deciding whether or not to offer further safety.
News protection of the encounter, which was extravagant on each side of the Atlantic, identified the discrepancies within the accounts of the episode. But on this event, the New York tabloids made extra of it than their London counterparts, which ran front-page images of the couple however not judgmental headlines.
The New York Post’s front-page banner mentioned “Duke (and Duchess) of Hazard,” whereas The Daily News mentioned, “Scary Echo of Diana.”
Harry has lawsuits pending towards the publishers of three London tabloids, The Daily Mail, The Daily Mirror, and The Sun, which he accuses of invading his privateness by hacking his cellphone and different illicit strategies. Meghan gained a case towards the writer of the Mail on Sunday for publishing a personal letter she despatched to her estranged father, Thomas Markle, on the time of her marriage ceremony.
In considered one of Harry’s circumstances, towards Rupert Murdoch’s British newspaper group, Harry mentioned the corporate paid a “huge sum of money” in 2020 to settle claims that its journalists hacked the cellphone of his older brother, Prince William. The firm and Kensington Palace, William’s workplace, declined to remark.
The proof of systematic hacking of the telephones of celebrities, royals and others led to the Leveson Inquiry, a judicial inquest that resulted in publishers ending the apply of cellphone hacking. They additionally curbed the aggressiveness of photographers who observe celebrities and members of the royal household.
While paparazzi have proven a level of restraint since being publicly shamed in Britain, they nonetheless have a reasonably free hand within the United States, the place they’ve confronted much less of a backlash towards their strategies.
Mr. Owens, the historian, mentioned the British press accepted these measures as a result of they fearful that if they didn’t, the federal government would impose obligatory curbs. For the royal household, that set off a interval of relative calm with the press that solely ended when Harry started courting an American actress named Meghan Markle.
“The royal family’s lives should have gotten easier in the U.K,” after press protection calmed, Mr. Owens mentioned. “At the same time, the toxicity of the relationship between the royal family and the media has continued. There has been both a softening of the press’s approach and a more aggressive approach by the family to how they are covered.”
In the Netflix documentary, “Harry & Meghan,” the couple are depicted peering nervously out the home windows of their S.U.V. for photographers pursuing them, as they depart a parking storage and head to an occasion. The scene is about in Manhattan.
Maria Cramer contributed reporting from New York
Source: www.nytimes.com