The listening to was earlier than a single-judge bench of Justice Krishna S Dixit. Additional Solicitor General R Sankaranarayanan showing for the federal government gave particulars of account customers who have been blocked for posting objectionable content material.
The ASG additionally learn out the Shreya Singhal case the place the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, regarding restrictions on on-line speech, as unconstitutional on grounds of violating the liberty of speech assured below Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.
The SC within the Shreya Singhal case held that on-line intermediaries would solely be obligated to take down content material on receiving an order from a court docket or authorities authority.
Earlier in February, the Central authorities had opposed the petition filed by Twitter difficult the blocking orders handed by the Government of India. The ASG had questioned the maintainability of the petition filed by the international firm saying Twitter cannot espouse freedom of speech of its customers within the absence of an enabling statute.
The ASG on Monday within the Karnataka HC learn blocking orders of sure accounts that have been despatched to Twitter. He additionally referred to the assertion of objections filed by the central authorities. During the course of the listening to the ASG gave comparative particulars of the legislation within the UK and in India with regard to powers and obligations of intermediaries, and stated he’ll give extra particulars of the comparative evaluation.
Discover the tales of your curiosity
The subsequent listening to on the matter might be on March 16.
Source: economictimes.indiatimes.com