Michael J. Gottlieb can by no means bear in mind the precise quantity — it’s $148,169,000— {that a} jury ordered Rudolph W. Giuliani to pay the Georgia election staff Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. But Ms. Freeman’s phrases after the December 2023 victory are indelible to him.
“Don’t waste your time being angry at those who did this to me and my daughter,” mentioned Ms. Freeman 65, who together with her daughter Ms. Moss, 39, was falsely accused by Mr. Giuliani of aiding an imagined plot to steal the 2020 presidential election.
“We are more than conquerors.”
Less than a decade in the past, the 2 girls would have struggled to discover a lawyer. But Mr. Gottlieb, a accomplice on the agency Willkie Farr & Gallagher and a former affiliate counsel within the Obama White House, represented them free of charge. Convinced that viral lies threaten public discourse and democracy, he’s on the forefront of a small however rising cadre of attorneys deploying defamation, one of many oldest areas of the regulation, as a weapon towards a tide of political disinformation.
Mr. Gottlieb has additionally represented the proprietor of the Washington pizzeria focused by “Pizzagate” conspiracy theorists in addition to the brother of Seth Rich, a younger Democratic National Committee workers member whose 2016 homicide ignited bogus theories implicating his household. In the Giuliani case, Mr. Gottlieb, his regulation accomplice Meryl Governski and different members of his group labored with Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan group that pushes for legal guidelines and insurance policies to counter what it sees as authoritarian threats.
Before the Trump period and the explosion of social media, although, such circumstances had been just about nonexistent.
“The new information landscape we’re in is a little bit like the Wild West — a lawless space,” mentioned Ian Bassin, a co-founder of Protect Democracy. Lawyers, he mentioned, have turned to defamation, which is legally outlined as any false data, both printed, broadcast or spoken, that harms the status of an individual, business or group. “It’s one of the most effective and only strategies for dealing with these out-and-out falsehoods,” Mr. Bassin mentioned.
In the previous few years, greater than a dozen high-profile defamation circumstances have made their method by way of the courts. A majority have been introduced towards defendants on the appropriate, however the appropriate brings lawsuits too, typically towards media organizations.
In 2020 and 2021, The Washington Post, Act Daily News and NBC settled a defamation case introduced by Nick Sandmann, a Kentucky highschool pupil, who mentioned the retailers had wrongly described his encounter with a Native American elder as a racially tinged confrontation. Mr. Sandmann’s go well with towards different retailers, together with The New York Times, ended final week when the Supreme Court declined to listen to the case.
Payouts have been notably massive for defamation circumstances towards the appropriate. In January the lawyer Roberta Kaplan defeated former President Donald J. Trump in court docket when a jury ordered him to pay $83 million for defaming her shopper, E. Jean Carroll, a author he sexually abused. Last yr attorneys from the agency Susman Godfrey secured a $787.5 million settlement for Dominion Voting Systems from Fox News, one of many greatest ever in a defamation case, after Fox aired bogus theories falsely linking the corporate to election fraud. In late 2022 Sandy Hook households defamed by the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones gained a complete of almost $1.5 billion from juries in Texas and Connecticut, although Mr. Jones has but to pay them something.
In different circumstances, the individuals harmed, like Ms. Freeman and Ms. Moss, can not afford attorneys or wrestle to search out corporations prepared to pursue defendants unable or proof against paying massive damages, like Mr. Giuliani. Mr. Gottlieb has tried to fill that hole.
“The cost of bringing a defamation suit to trial can be enormous, often exceeding a quarter-million dollars’ worth of expenses, to say nothing of the value of attorney time,” mentioned Mark Bankston, a lawyer for a number of the Sandy Hook households defamed by Mr. Jones.
Mr. Gottlieb and his group confer with their circumstances as a “hobby” in service to these whose lives and reputations have been broken by individuals with energy and enormous on-line followings. “I’ve always despised bullies that pick on defenseless or seemingly defenseless people,” Mr. Gottlieb, 47, mentioned in an interview in his Ok Street workplace in Washington. “There are so many ways to make your political points without endangering individual people’s lives.”
Mr. Gottlieb’s day job is stuffed with the highly effective shopper checklist extra typical of huge Washington regulation corporations. He has represented Venezuela’s Citgo petroleum firm; helped the billionaire Steven A. Cohen beat a possible lifetime ban on managing shopper cash after accusations of insider buying and selling at Mr. Cohen’s former hedge fund; and labored with President Biden’s son Hunter on behalf of a Romanian actual property tycoon whose seven-year jail sentence for corruption was later vacated by a Romanian court docket.
“I understand there are definitely people who would say, ‘Wait a minute — litigation for Citgo is not the same as the litigation you’re doing for Ruby and Shaye,’” he mentioned. “I feel fortunate to have had a career where I’ve had a wide variety of cases and have a practice that works different skill sets and different parts of my brain.
“However people want to think about it and look at it is sort of fine with me.”
The Post-Truth World
Mr. Gottlieb, who was a clerk for Justice John Paul Stevens and served on an Obama administration anti-corruption job power in Afghanistan, had his first foray into the post-truth world in 2016. That was when Mr. Jones and his Infowars outlet unfold the lie that Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party operatives had been operating a baby intercourse trafficking ring out of Comet Ping Pong, a Washington pizzeria owned by James Alefantis.
In December of that yr, a person who had been binging on Infowars “Pizzagate” episodes fired a rifle contained in the restaurant. No one was injured, however the gunman’s journey to Washington to avenge an imagined crime foreshadowed a collection of violent assaults by conspiracy theorists, together with the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
Mr. Jones insisted that the First Amendment protected the lies he had broadcast, like most defendants in these circumstances. But threatened with a lawsuit, he made an on-air retraction and eliminated all Pizzagate content material from Infowars’ web site and social media channels. The full settlement stays confidential.
Soon after the Pizzagate case, Mr. Gottlieb represented Aaron Rich, whose brother Seth Rich, 27, labored for the Democratic National Committee and was gunned down in a botched theft in 2016. The case stays unsolved, and wild theories that Seth Rich was killed by Democrats unfold from on-line fever swamps to Fox News. Aaron Rich and his dad and mom had been implicated within the plots, doxxed and harassed.
“If this had happened to me or my brother or sister and somebody was doing this to my parents, I would go ballistic,” Mr. Gottlieb mentioned. “And no one was helping them.”
In 2018 Mr. Gottlieb and Aaron Rich sued The Washington Times in addition to an web provocateur, Matt Couch, and a businessman, Ed Butowsky, for spreading falsehoods that the 2 brothers had offered D.N.C. paperwork in a plot that resulted in Seth Rich’s homicide. Mr. Rich finally acquired a confidential settlement that included a retraction of the falsehoods unfold by each males and the newspaper, in addition to an apology to the Rich household. Mr. Rich’s dad and mom retained Susman Godfrey and sued Fox News. They obtained a confidential money settlement, however no apology.
The Rich case had taken years. At one level Mr. Gottlieb was named in a sweeping defamation lawsuit filed by one of many defendants, which was later dropped.
The aftermath of the 2020 election introduced extra calls from potential shoppers. Mr. Gottlieb appealed for assist to Mr. Bassin, the co-founder of Protect Democracy, who had served with Mr. Gottlieb within the Obama White House Counsel’s Office.
The Georgia Case
Less than two months later, Mr. Gottlieb and his group had been writing the criticism in Ruby Freeman, et al., v. Rudolph Giuliani.
In his frenzied public scramble to make his case that the 2020 election was stolen from Mr. Trump, Mr. Giuliani, the previous president’s lawyer, had unfold the false story that Ms. Freeman and her daughter Ms. Moss had colluded to falsify outcomes whereas counting ballots in Georgia. He falsely claimed {that a} video exhibiting Ms. Freeman handing a small merchandise to her daughter — a ginger mint — was the 2 girls exchanging USB thumb drives “as if they’re vials of heroin and cocaine.”
Mr. Trump echoed the bogus allegations. In an notorious taped telephone name with Georgia election officers, Mr. Trump named Ms. Freeman repeatedly, calling her a “professional vote scammer” and “hustler.”
Threats poured in to the 2 girls. People known as them traitors and, utilizing racial slurs, demanded they be lynched or shot. Others banged on Ms. Freeman’s entrance door and lurked outdoors her house, forcing her into hiding. Ms. Moss had to surrender her job as an election employee and struggled to search out work.
Mr. Giuliani mentioned he would show his innocence. But he didn’t submit court-ordered paperwork, testify or name witnesses. In the courtroom, he fiddled together with his telephone and rolled his eyes whereas the 2 girls described their terror.
In December, a jury in federal court docket in Washington ordered Mr. Giuliani to pay Ms. Freeman and Ms. Moss the $148 million. The case was placed on maintain after Mr. Giuliani declared chapter, and Ms. Freeman and Ms. Moss are actually suing Mr. Giuliani once more, for his continued false statements about them.
Law for Truth, a part of Protect Democracy, has within the meantime filed defamation fits towards the makers of the election conspiracy idea movie “20,000 Mules”; James O’Keefe, the previous chief of Project Veritas, a right-wing group identified for its sting operations; and Kari Lake, a candidate for U.S. Senate in Arizona, on behalf of individuals smeared by lies Ms. Lake advised concerning the 2020 election.
Despite the exercise, attorneys who see themselves as crusaders towards lies usually are not declaring victory. Their circumstances are excessive profile and goal key disinformation spreaders, however they acknowledge that they don’t put a dent in additional basic widespread disinformation, like false statements about Covid vaccines.
“I think these lawsuits may be effective in stemming some of the worst viral disinformation,” mentioned Katie Fallow, a senior counsel on the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. “But there may be limits to how effective these lawsuits can be when there are other incentives, particularly political ones, to keep spreading it.”
Kenneth P. Vogel contributed reporting. Kitty Bennett contributed analysis.
Source: www.nytimes.com