ChatGPT can present researchers with helpful suggestions on their papers, suggesting it might complement the human peer evaluation course of that helps scientific journals resolve which research to publish. But others are sceptical that ChatGPT might play a task in peer evaluation.
Peer evaluation is a important part of scientific publishing. However, many journals and analysis conferences are struggling to recruit sufficient human peer reviewers – who usually volunteer their time without cost – to judge the rising variety of submitted papers.
“It’s getting more durable …
Source: www.newscientist.com