Vivek Ramaswamy, an entrepreneur and writer, commanded appreciable consideration in the course of the first Republican major debate as his standing was rising in nationwide polls.
Railing in opposition to “wokeism” and the “climate cult,” Mr. Ramaswamy has staked out unorthodox positions on a lot of points and characterised himself because the candidate more than likely to attraction to younger and new conservative voters.
Here’s a reality verify of his latest remarks on the marketing campaign path and in the course of the debate.
Climate change denial
What Mr. Ramaswamy Said
“There was this Obama appointee, climate change activist, who also believes as part of this Gaia-centric worldview of the earth that water rights need to be protected, which led to a five- to six-hour delay in the critical window of getting waters to put out those fires. We will never know, although certain science points out to the fact that we very well could have avoided those catastrophic deaths, many of them, if water had made it to the site of the fires on time.”
— at a conservative convention in Atlanta in August
This lacks proof. Mr. Ramaswamy was referring to M. Kaleo Manuel, the deputy director for Hawaii’s Commission on Water Resource Management, and overstating his ties to President Barack Obama in addition to the potential impact of the requested water diversion.
First, Mr. Manuel just isn’t an “Obama appointee” however quite participated in a management growth program run by the Obama Foundation in 2019. Mr. Ramaswamy and different conservative personalities have derided feedback Mr. Manuel made final 12 months when he stated that native Hawaiians like himself used to think about water one thing to “revere” and one thing that “gives us life.”
On Aug. 8, the day wildfire engulfed a historic city in Hawaii, Mr. Manuel was contacted by the West Maui Land Company, an actual property developer that provides water to areas southeast of the city of Lahaina on Maui island, The New York Times has reported. Noting excessive winds and drought, the corporate requested permission to fill a non-public reservoir for hearth management, although the reservoir was not linked to fireplace hydrants. No hearth was blazing within the space on the time.
The water company requested the corporate whether or not the hearth division had made the request, acquired no reply and stated that it wanted the approval of a farmer who relied on the water for his crops. The firm stated that it couldn’t attain the farmer, however that the company permitted the request hours later.
Asked for proof of Mr. Ramaswamy’s declare that filling the reservoir when initially requested would have prevented deaths from the hearth, a spokeswoman stated it was “common sense — if you can put out a fire faster using water, you can save lives.”
But state officers have stated it’s unlikely that the delay would have modified the course of the hearth that swallowed Lahaina, as excessive winds would have prevented firefighters from getting access to the reservoir. In an Aug. 10 letter to the water company, an govt on the West Maui Land Company acknowledged that there was no strategy to know whether or not “filling our reservoirs” when initially requested would have modified the result, however requested the company to briefly droop present water rules. The govt, in one other letter, additionally wrote that “we would never imply responsibility” on Mr. Manuel’s half.
What Mr. Ramaswamy Said
“The reality is more people are dying of bad climate change policies than they are of actual climate change.”
— within the first Republican debate on Wednesday
False. There is not any proof to help this assertion. A spokeswoman for Mr. Ramaswamy cited a 2022 column within the libertarian publication “Reason” that argued that limiting the usage of fossil fuels would hamper the flexibility to ship energy, warmth houses and pump water throughout excessive climate occasions. But the marketing campaign didn’t present examples of local weather change insurance policies truly inflicting deaths.
The World Meteorological Organization, a United Nations company, estimated in May that excessive climate occasions, compounded by local weather change, triggered practically 12,000 disasters and a dying toll of two million between 1970 and 2021. Extreme warmth causes about 600 deaths within the United States a 12 months, in response to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A 2021 research discovered {that a} third of heat-related deaths might be attributed to local weather change.
In marketing campaign appearances and social media posts, Mr. Ramaswamy has additionally pointed to a decline within the variety of disaster-related deaths previously century, whilst emissions have risen
That, specialists have stated, is basically due to technological advances in climate forecasting and communication, mitigation instruments and constructing codes. The May research by the World Meteorological Organization, for instance, famous that 90 p.c of utmost climate deaths happen in growing international locations — exactly due to the hole in technological advances. Disasters are occurring at growing frequencies, the group has stated, whilst fatalities lower.
Jan. 6 and the 2020 election
What Mr. Ramaswamy Said
“What percentage of the people who were armed were federal law-enforcement officers? I think it was probably high, actually. Right? There’s very little evidence of people being arrested for being armed that day. Most of the people who were armed, I assume the federal officers who were out there were armed.”
— in an interview with The Atlantic in July
False. Mr. Ramaswamy has echoed the right-wing speaking level that the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol didn’t contain weapons and was largely peaceable. His spokeswoman argued that he was merely asking questions.
But as early this month, 104 out of about 1,100 complete defendants have been charged with getting into a restricted space with a harmful or lethal weapon, in response to the Justice Department. At least 13 face gun expenses.
It is inconceivable to know simply how many individuals within the crowd of 28,000 had been armed, as some could have hid their weapons or chosen to stay outdoors of magnetometers arrange on the Ellipse, a sprawling park close to the White House, the place Mr. Trump held his rally. Still, by way of these magnetometers, Secret Service confiscated 242 canisters of pepper spray, 269 knives or blades, 18 brass knuckles, 18 stun weapons, 30 batons or blunt devices, and 17 miscellaneous objects like scissors, needles or screwdrivers, in response to the ultimate report from the Jan. 6 committee.
What was Said
Chris Christie, former governor of New Jersey: “In your book, you had much different things to say about Donald Trump than you’re saying here tonight.”
Mr. Ramaswamy: “That’s not true.”
— within the Republican debate
Mr. Ramaswamy was mistaken. During the controversy, Mr. Ramaswamy vigorously defended Mr. Trump, calling him “ the best president of the 21st century.” Mr. Christie was right that Mr. Ramaswamy was far more essential of Mr. Trump in his books.
In his 2022 e-book, “Nation of Victims,” Mr. Ramaswamy wrote that regardless of voting for Mr. Trump in 2020, “what he delivered in the end was another tale of grievance, a persecution complex that swallowed much of the Republican Party whole.”
Mr. Ramaswamy added that he was “especially disappointed when I saw President Trump take a page from the Stacey Abrams playbook,” referring to the Democratic candidate for Georgia governor who, after her 2018 defeat, sued the state over accusations of voter suppression. Moreover, he wrote, Mr. Trump’s claims of electoral fraud had been “weak” and “weren’t grounded in fact.”
In his 2021 e-book, “Woke Inc.,” Mr. Ramaswamy described the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol as a “a disgrace, and it was a stain on our history” that made him “ashamed of our nation.”
And after the Jan. 6 assault, Mr. Ramaswamy wrote on Twitter, “What Trump did last week was wrong. Downright abhorrent. Plain and simple.”
Foreign coverage
What Mr. RAMASWAMY stated
“Much of our military defense spending in the last several decades has not actually gone to national defense.”
— in an interview on the Fox Business Network in August
False. A spokeswoman for Mr. Ramaswamy stated he was evaluating army support to international international locations and “homeland defense.” But the quantity the United States has spent on safety help pales compared to common army spending and homeland safety spending.
According to the federal authorities’s international help portal, army support to different international locations ranged from $6 billion to $23 billion yearly from the fiscal years 2000 to 2022, peaking within the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 when support to Afghanistan alone topped $10 billion a 12 months.
In the previous twenty years, the Pentagon’s annual price range ranged from over $400 billion to over $800 billion. Operation and upkeep is the most important class of spending (36 p.c) and consists of cash spent on gas, provides, services, recruiting and coaching, adopted by compensation for army personnel (23 p.c), procurement of recent gear and weapons (19 p.c), and analysis and growth (16 p.c).
The Department of Homeland Security itself has an annual price range that has elevated from $40 billion within the 2004 fiscal 12 months, when the company was created, to over $100 billion within the 2023 fiscal 12 months.
Mr. Ramaswamy’s declare displays a standard false impression amongst American voters, who are likely to overestimate the quantity spent on international support. Foreign support of all classes — together with army support in addition to help for well being initiatives, financial growth or democratic governance — makes up lower than 1 p.c of the whole federal price range. In comparability, about one-sixth of federal spending goes to nationwide protection, in response to the Congressional Budget Office.
Outside of official authorities figures, researchers at Brown University have estimated that since Sept. 11, army spending within the United States has exceeded $8 trillion. By that breakdown, the United States has spent $2.3 trillion in funding for abroad preventing versus $1.1 trillion in homeland safety defenses. But that determine additionally consists of spending that can not be neatly categorized as abroad versus home protection spending: $1.3 trillion normally army spending will increase and medical care, $1.1 trillion in curiosity funds and $2.2 trillion for future veterans care.
What Was Said
Nikki Haley, former United Nations ambassador: “You want to go and defund Israel, you want to give Taiwan to China. You want to go and give Ukraine to Russia.”
Mr. Ramaswamy: “Let me address that. I’m glad you brought that up. I’m going to address each of those right now. This is the false lies of a professional politician.”
— in the Republican debate
Both exaggerated. Ms. Haley omitted nuance in describing Mr. Ramaswamy’s foreign policy positions, but her characterizations are far from “lies.”
In interviews and campaign appearances, Mr. Ramaswamy has said that he views the deal to provide Israel with $38 billion over 10 years for its security as “sacrosanct.” But he has said that by 2028, when the deal expires, he hopes that Israel “will not require and be dependent on that same level of historical aid or commitment from the U.S.”
In a nearly hourlong speech at the Nixon Library this month, Mr. Ramaswamy said his administration would “defend Taiwan if China invades Taiwan before we have semiconductor independence in this country,” which he estimated he could achieve by 2028. But, he continued, “thereafter, we will be very clear that after the U.S. achieves semiconductor independence, our commitments to send our sons and daughters to put them in harm’s way will change.”
On Russia’s war in Ukraine, Mr. Ramaswamy has said he would “freeze the current lines of control” — which includes several southeastern regions of Ukraine — and pledge to prohibit Ukraine from being admitted to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization if Russia ended its “alliance” with China. (The two countries do not have a formal alliance.)
Lisa Friedman contributed reporting.
We welcome strategies and suggestions from readers on what to fact-check on e mail and Twitter.
Source: www.nytimes.com