The world’s superior economies have dedicated to phasing out coal over the following seven years. But not Japan, which stands alone in insisting it may well make coal much less damaging to the planet.
Nowhere is that extra evident than on the nation’s largest coal-fired energy plant in Hekinan, a small metropolis in central Japan the place 400,000 tons of jet-black piles are unfold throughout a plot the dimensions of 40 soccer fields.
Starting subsequent spring, Jera, the corporate that owns the location, desires to exhibit that it may well mix ammonia — which doesn’t emit carbon dioxide when burned — with coal in its boilers. The use of this new know-how is prompting a debate over whether or not it’s higher to search out cleaner methods of utilizing coal, or to scrap it as quickly as attainable in favor of renewable power.
The firm says the ammonia technique can scale back harmful emissions within the battle towards world warming. In an effort initially conceived — and closely sponsored — by Japan’s authorities, it’s one among a number of energy firms planning to make use of ammonia in a course of marketed as “clean coal.”
With ammonia, the businesses can “use the plants we have rather than building entirely new ones,” mentioned Katsuya Tanigawa, the final supervisor at Jera’s Hekinan web site.
Japan attracts practically a 3rd of its electrical energy provide from coal, one of many world’s dirtiest sources of power. But critics say the usage of ammonia merely extends Japan’s reliance on fossil fuels and will probably improve carbon emissions because the ammonia is produced. Burning ammonia also can produce nitrogen oxide, which is poisonous to people and is one other emission to be managed.
“We need to be reducing emissions from coal power plants now, not exploring a technology that may or may not be feasible,” mentioned Katrine Petersen, a senior coverage adviser at E3G, a suppose tank.
Anxiety in Japan about power has grown exponentially since an earthquake and tsunami triggered a triple meltdown on the Fukushima Daichi nuclear energy plant in 2011. Right after the catastrophe, Japan shut down all of its nuclear vegetation, extinguishing 30 p.c of the nation’s electrical energy provide in a single day. To compensate, the nation’s energy firms scurried to construct new coal vegetation even because the world was transferring away from fossil fuels.
Japan’s prime minister, Fumio Kishida, has just lately intensified efforts to reboot the nation’s nuclear energy community, however communities that host the vegetation have resisted.
Japan, the world’s third-largest financial system, has few of its personal pure sources, and might produce solely 11 p.c of its power wants with out gas imports — one of many lowest self-sufficiency charges among the many world’s wealthiest nations.
At a gathering of surroundings ministers from the Group of seven leaders in Sapporo this spring, Japan was the one nation that refused to decide to bringing its coal utilization all the way down to zero by 2030.
The authorities and the nation’s energy trade level to quite a few hurdles to constructing renewable power sources shortly, together with Japan’s geographic isolation, mountainous terrain, deep sea waters and annual hurricane season.
Along with China, which President Xi Jinping just lately mentioned would comply with its personal “tempo and intensity” in reducing carbon emissions, Japanese officers say their nation has its personal timetable and strategies, as properly.
“We want to go up the same mountain to the same summit,” mentioned Atsushi Kodaka, the director of the power technique workplace within the Trade Ministry. “But our climbing route doesn’t have to be the same as everyone else.”
The energy trade can be reluctant to desert coal as a result of it has spent a lot just lately to construct new vegetation. Since 2011, Japanese energy firms have constructed 40 coal vegetation — practically 1 / 4 of Japan’s whole coal-fired community — with a brand new Jera plant going surfing final month.
Together with trade, the Japanese authorities has dedicated about 152 trillion yen (about $1.1 trillion) over 10 years to assist the nation obtain internet zero carbon emissions. By 2030, the Trade Ministry says, it is going to scale back coal-based technology to 19 p.c of the ability provide, with the ammonia know-how comprising about 1 p.c, and it’s more likely to rise.
Jera is aware of it has to persuade a probably skeptical public of its plans, and so it’s operating commercials in film theaters and handing out low cost coupons that promote its efforts to develop “zero-emission thermal power.”
Japan additionally hopes to ultimately export the know-how to its neighbors in Asia, the place it has helped construct new coal vegetation in recent times.
“We are trying to decrease the dependence on coal itself in such countries,” mentioned Masashi Watanabe, a pure sources and power planner within the Trade Ministry. “Ammonia co-firing could be one solution.”
In Hekinan, welders just lately secured the highest of a 700-ton storage tank on the sprawling Jera plant. Multiple giant orange pipes lay scattered on the bottom, ready to be fitted right into a pipeline that can transport ammonia to the plant’s boilers.
During a latest take a look at, the corporate blended a combination of 0.02 p.c ammonia with fist-size chunks of coal in a boiler heated to 1,500 diploma Celsius, greater than 2,700 levels Fahrenheit. Meeting its subsequent goal will probably be an even bigger problem.
By March, the corporate desires to start testing mixtures made up of as a lot as 20 p.c ammonia, changing into the primary on this planet to take action.
Even if the know-how works, procuring a gradual, inexpensive and clear provide of ammonia might considerably pressure the world’s provide of the compound, which is required to supply fertilizer.
The authorities’s personal Green Growth Strategy acknowledges that if all of Japan’s coal-fired vegetation used 20 p.c ammonia, “they would need about 20 million tons of ammonia per year” — equal to your complete quantity of ammonia at the moment traded on the world market.
Such provide constraints made the ammonia plan “almost impossible” to execute, mentioned Hajime Takizawa, a local weather and power researcher on the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, a government-funded, unbiased analysis group. The authorities, although, says that when it proves that the know-how works, suppliers will meet demand.
But producing ammonia itself requires electrical energy, which below present strategies is often generated from fossil fuels like coal or pure gasoline. In one widespread course of, water is heated to extraordinarily excessive temperatures — as excessive as 2,000 levels Celsius, or 3,632 levels Fahrenheit — in order that hydrogen atoms will be cut up off and mixed with nitrogen. (Check out your highschool science textbooks for the chemical formulation of ammonia!)
Heating that water requires plenty of energy, and the ammonia provides that can initially circulation to Japan will doubtless be made utilizing so-called grey or brown electrical energy. So whereas burning ammonia in an influence plant reduces carbon emissions in a single place, making ammonia could generate extra carbon emissions in one other.
As a end result, the ammonia technique has “a very tiny mitigation potential,” mentioned Masayoshi Iyoda, the chief of the Japan group for 350.org, a local weather activist group.
Suppliers say they are going to ultimately use renewable power to make ammonia or seize the carbon emitted through the manufacturing course of and bury it within the floor. Analysts say that given the prices of such strategies, mixing ammonia and coal will probably be costlier than merely utilizing renewable power like wind energy immediately.
Ultimately, critics say, Japan is prioritizing the ammonia know-how to guard entrenched industrial pursuits towards new renewable power suppliers. “They are fully aware that they are losers in this shift,” mentioned Kimiko Hirata, a founding father of Climate Integrate, a analysis and advocacy group. “So they are really big on protecting the status quo and vested interests as long as possible.”
Source: www.nytimes.com