A Hong Kong decide mentioned on Friday that he would rule subsequent week on a authorities request to ban a well-liked pro-democracy tune from the web, in a case that might pressure Google and different corporations to limit entry to the tune.
At subject is “Glory to Hong Kong,” which was the anthem of the 2019 protests that ended with Beijing taking tighter management over Hong Kong. The authorities argue that the tune is an insult to China’s nationwide anthem and will make individuals imagine that Hong Kong is an impartial nation. The authorities has banned it from faculties and lashed out when it was performed, apparently by mistake, at sports activities competitions.
On Friday Judge Anthony Chan, after listening to three hours of authorized arguments, mentioned he would subject his determination on July 28. The authorities is looking for an injunction to ban the publication or distribution on-line of “Glory to Hong Kong.” Anyone violating the injunction might face jail for contempt of courtroom.
The case is being intently watched by tech corporations, as a result of it has raised the specter of extra authorities management of on-line speech in Hong Kong.
“The business community should take notice — the courts won’t be able to protect them as long as the Hong Kong government can plausibly claim that national security interests are in play,” mentioned Thomas E. Kellogg, the chief director of the Center for Asian Law at Georgetown University.
Google has resisted the federal government’s public requests that “Glory to Hong Kong” not present up in search outcomes or on its sibling service, YouTube. But that might change if a courtroom ordered it to abide by the request. Like most tech corporations, Google has a coverage of eradicating or proscribing entry to materials that’s deemed unlawful by a courtroom in sure nations or locations.
Google, which is owned by Alphabet, mentioned it might not touch upon the case, as did Meta, the dad or mum firm of Facebook. Google and Facebook established workplaces in Hong Kong over a decade in the past, and immediately every has as much as a number of hundred staff within the metropolis. Apple didn’t reply to requests for remark.
The authorities in Hong Kong have more and more cracked down on what they think about dissent and threats to nationwide safety, concentrating on people with arrests, bounties and prosecution.
At the identical time, the federal government is working to move laws by early subsequent 12 months that will goal what it considers subversive content material and shut “internet loopholes,” a transfer that might have extra far-reaching penalties and codify the ban into legislation.
Hong Kong has lengthy attracted overseas companies looking for entry and proximity to China, away from its censorship controls. It has been the one Chinese territory with unfettered entry to companies reminiscent of Google and Facebook, which pulled out of China years in the past.
When Google refused a request to take away the tune in December, Hong Kong’s safety chief known as the corporate’s determination “unthinkable.”
In courtroom on Friday, Benjamin Yu, a lawyer for the federal government arguing why the tune must be banned, mentioned it had been used to “stir up emotions.” He pointed to the arrest of a harmonica participant who had performed the tune outdoors the British consulate when mourning the dying of Queen Elizabeth II final 12 months.
Abraham Chan, a lawyer performing as pal of the courtroom to current opposing arguments, mentioned banning the tune due to nationwide safety might disrupt the free movement of data.
“You can’t simply say ‘Don’t worry about the chilling effects,’” he mentioned.
The Hong Kong authorities have arrested greater than 250 individuals beneath an expansive nationwide safety legislation Beijing imposed on the town in 2020, aimed toward stamping out opposition to the ruling Communist Party.
Compared to “slow-grinding” prison instances towards people, an injunction might give the federal government a fast path to proscribing content material on on-line platforms, mentioned Kevin Yam, a authorized researcher and former Hong Kong lawyer primarily based in Melbourne.
No firm or particular person was named as a direct defendant within the authorities’s injunction utility, which included 32 hyperlinks to “Glory to Hong Kong” on YouTube.
But many worry {that a} courtroom injunction towards “Glory to Hong Kong” might be a step towards extra official management over the web in Hong Kong, the place the web stays principally freed from censorship regardless of Beijing’s heavier hand in governing the territory.
American tech corporations like Facebook and Twitter had been blocked from mainland China in 2009. A 12 months later, Google shut down its China companies and rerouted customers to its search engine in Hong Kong, then a bastion of political freedom on Chinese soil.
Since the nationwide safety legislation was put in place, requests to tech corporations by the Hong Kong authorities to take away content material on the web have soared.
Chang Che contributed reporting from Seoul.
Source: www.nytimes.com